- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:22:39 -0600
- To: <po@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, "'Ian Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-cg@w3.org>
I don't think the guidelines should not be neutral on the issue of marking certain elements for semantic function or relationships. I think the guidelines should indicate that this is an important way for improving accessibility for some types of disabilities. The details of how to indicate relationships and function, I agree should be in a techniques document. I think semantic function and relationships will even become a more important issue as XML usage increases. I think it would be a good idea to get people thinking this way. Jon At 08:27 PM 3/24/99 -0600, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >Hi Jon, > >It is mentioned in the techniques doc, but not in the guidelines doc. Only >the Guidelines Doc are going to "recommendation". The techniques doc is an >accompanying doc. Hence the confusion with saying that it will be included >in the techniques but will not be in the recommendation. > >This type of detail is not generally in the guidelines.. but is found in the >techniques doc. > >Gregg > >-- ------------------------------ >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Human Factors >Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. >Director - Trace R & D Center >Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ >FAX 608/262-8848 >For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu > > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf >Of Jon Gunderson >Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 4:42 PM >To: Al Gilman; Ian Jacobs; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org >Cc: w3c-wai-cg@w3.org >Subject: Re: QUESTIONS on resolutions stated in Minutes from 23 March >teleconference. > >If markup indicating element function is not in Web Content guidelines then >I think it will be meaningless to define it in UAs. Authors will not be >looking in the UA guidelines on how to develop Web Content. >>b) The proposed recommendation does not explicitly or implicitly say >>anything about whether such a technique is appropriate or inappropriate. > >JRG: I don't understand this. I would think that any information about >grouping or function that would improve accessibility for people with >disabilities would be appropriate. >Why did the group make this decision? >Issue 26 states that there was a resolution to include at least class="nav" >in the techniques document. >It seems to also be mentioned in issue 83 > > > > >> >>c) This class of technique is sufficiently controversial so that the chairs >>did not want to include it in something bearing the PR declaration of >>working group decision. > >If not class is there no other markup available? >> >>d) There is motivation under various of the guidelines that _are_ in the >>Proposed Recommendation for techniques which would employ such predefined >>names. > >JRG: This seems to contradict statement b in this e-mail. >> >>e) The techniques are not viewed as frozen with the checkpoints. It is >>appropriate for the techniques to evolve and for novel techniques to be >>initiated by the User Agent Working Group, particularly if it is believed >>that User Agents and Authoring Tools can and will implement them. >>Coordination with the authoring tools community is a key ingredient in a >>successful proposal in this area. > >JRG: Is this a chicken or an egg problem? I think this solution will make >the process less efficient for the other groups, since now all of Web >Content discussion on these issues will now be duplicated in both UA and AU. >I thought these issues were going to resolved in GL, apparently I was wrong. >Has anybody discussed the process for transfering these issues to the other >groups for resolution? > > > > > >Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP >Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology >Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services >University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign >1207 S. Oak Street >Champaign, IL 61820 > >Voice: 217-244-5870 >Fax: 217-333-0248 >E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu >WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund > http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Thursday, 25 March 1999 10:18:56 UTC