- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:26:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: dd@w3.org
- cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Another example: Ministry of silly walks writes its internal Web Content Style Guide, and that Style Guide claims that it describes a process which is conformant to double-A of the etc On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > Example: "This standard conforms to conformance level 'Double-A' of 'Web > Content Accessibility Guidelines' available at > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990316." I'm still at lost of what that means exactly. If some organization claims that their guidelines conforms to AA for instance, does it mean that the best practices they advocate in their document "include" at least all of our AA checkpoints, or "is exactly" our set of AA checkpoints ? Can they change the wording we use ? What does "satisfying" mean for a process ? --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 1999 09:26:14 UTC