- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:46:55 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- CC: jbrewer@w3.org, charles@w3.org, dd@w3.org
Hello, The editors have produced a new draft [1] of the guidelines based on very VERY helpful reviews from a number of people. There are some significant changes that should improve the usability of the document. Not all comments have been processed yet. We will continue to address all substantive comments by raising them as issues either by email or at teleconferences. If you do not feel your comments have been addressed, please let us know as quickly as possible. If we have not responded to your comments on the list, we may not have gotten to them yet. NOTE. We are publishing this document to show how comments and WG resolutions are being incorporated. However, this means we have essentially two documents in last call: the original one people were asked to review, and this internal draft. Should reviewers (i.e., everyone) henceforth base their comments on this draft? While I believe they should, it is not clear in terms of the W3C Process whether the new draft should be put on the TR page as an updated document in last call. Judy, do you have suggestions? Guidelines: [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990316 Techniques: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990316/wai-pageauth-tech Changes to Guidelines: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-gl-wd-changes.html Changes to Techniques http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-gl-techniques-changes.html Open Issues for Guidelines: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-gl-issues.html Open Issues for Techniques: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-gl-tech-issues.html Thank you for your continued review, - The Editors -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 1999 00:47:16 UTC