- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:18:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
A.10.1 said: 1. For auto-refreshing or timed response pages, provide a second copy of the page where refresh only happens after a link has been selected (until user agents provide this ability themselves). [Priority 1] And I promised to write some techniques for it. Actually Daniel had asked for a lot of detail. So here is my short essay... Redirection of users can be very disorienting. It is quite common to find a page which contains <META HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" CONTENT="7;url=somewhere.com.nu"> and a note on the page explaining that the page has moved, and asking the user to update their bookmarks. This in fact violates the principle that standard mark-up should be used. While META HTTP-EQUIV is standard HTML, REFRESH is not standard in HTTP - it is simply recognised by many User Agents. There is a REDIRECT statement which can be used analagously. The actual accessibility problem is that reading speeds vary. What may seem adequate time to let a user read the page could be completely inadequate for somebody using a screen reader which doesn't get to the line before the page has vanished, or somebody with a reading difficulty who has been unable to get the message before something completely new has appeared. Similarly with timed-response requirements in active content. Although there is often a strong motivation for the timing requirement, it can cause problems for a number of groups and should be used with great care. In pages which do this I have two suggestions: 1. Don't. Leave the user to follow a link to the new page [CMN:: I don't know how well this will sell] 2. Provide, first thing on the page, a link like "SLOW DOWN", to a version of the page which doesn't change. CMN:: This is really a problem that User Agents should solve. But they generally don't, although Lynx does it beautifully. One of the interesting things I have had happen with JAWS is that it is reading a page which is two or three links behind where I am. That's confusing to me. Sigh. Another of Daniel's judgement call problems. --Charles McCathieNevile - mailto:charles@w3.org phone: * +1 (617) 258 0992 * http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative - http://www.w3.org/WAI 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, USA
Received on Thursday, 28 January 1999 01:18:57 UTC