- From: Nir Dagan <nir@nirdagan.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 02:38:08 GMT
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I think that there is a little confusion concerning the name and title attributes of FRAME. "name" is intented to be machine readable and has restrictive syntax. (Eg, it cannot have spaces, it must atart with a letter.) "title" is intended to be human readable text. I think best is to recommend: 1. use title P1. 2. use name that is descriptive to a human P2. (or maybe P1) I also think that it would make sense to recommend to HTML WG to make title a required attribute of FRAME in the next HTML version. After all, this is the only human readable link description available for the FRAME element. Using name is for backward compatibility (e.g. with Lynx2.8 that does not recognize the title attribute.). In principle a frame may have no name, if it is fixed (e.g., navigation bar) and the author doesn't want to target any other document in that frame. Using NOFRAMES improves considerably the usability of a site if multiple windows are not created, but if all the frames are represented as links with meaningful descriptions, it is still accessible. This makes it P2. There are other reasons to use NOFRAMES, such as accessibility to Excite!'s indexing robot, but this is beyond the scope of the WAI. Regards, Nir Dagan Assistant Professor of Economics Universidad Pompeu Fabra Ramon Trias Fargas 25 08005 Barcelona Spain http://www.nirdagan.com mailto:nir@nirdagan.com "There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory." -- A. Einstein
Received on Thursday, 7 January 1999 12:36:27 UTC