- From: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann <chuckop@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 03:38:26 -0800
- To: dd@w3.org
- Cc: po@trace.wisc.edu, "GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Okay, that's good points. How about going shorter (verses my other efforts) and calling them: "Web Accessibility Guidelines" I'm not sure what benefit the word "Content" brings. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Dardailler [mailto:danield@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 3:22 AM To: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann Cc: po@trace.wisc.edu; GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail); cg WAI Coordination Group (E-mail) Subject: Re: Name of Page Author Guidelines > I prefer: > "HTML and CSS Accessible Design Guidelines" > "HTML and CSS Guidelines for Accessible Design" > "HTML and CSS Universal Design Guidelines" > "HTML and CSS Accessible Authoring Guidelines" (weak) > > You get my drift. Although it's mostly about HTML&CSS today, we will update it to include more SMIL, XML, XSL, MathML, SVG, etc. in the future, so the question is do we want to have to change a name that we are going to promote as some kind of brand name in the upcoming year. I agree Page is a vague term and I'll also add Author is ambiguous, as it refers to different roles: the designer, the user of a wysiwyg tool, the html-by-hand author, and maybe other. These guidelines are really about what *is* in the Web pages, so I propose: Web Content Accessible Guidelines.
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 1998 06:38:31 UTC