- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:50:09 -0500
- To: "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The focus for our phone call today will be 1) Are there any techniques that are listed as recommended that a person cannot reasonably do (or be required to do) - Example - we used to say that they should use style sheets and not tables to lay out a page... yet no browsers today support positioning with style sheets. And if they did, a webmaster still couldn't use this approach since most (or at least a large part) of their audience would not yet be using these new browsers. So we would be requiring them to do something that they cannot really do. 2) After identifying them... can we reword the recommendations to make them realistic 3) How do we go about rating techniques separately from the guidelines. We have some not so important techniques that are part of a list of techniques under a very important (required) guideline. The goal is to have a table form of the guidelines that could be used to evaluate a site for accessibility if at all possible. That is, the techniques would be there and something to indicate the priority of the techniques and the expectation that they could be (and SHOULD be ) put into practice today. See you one the line Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http:// trace.wisc.edu / FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@ trace.wisc.edu
Received on Thursday, 16 July 1998 15:12:30 UTC