- From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:53:00 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 10:41 AM 31/03/98 +0200, Daniel wrote: >I guess we need to be more precised and mention that we do not >recommend their use for purely typographical presentation: use CSS >instead, and if it's to note strong or emphasis, people can use STRONG >and EM. Right; B, I, and TT should never be used in place of a phrase element that expresses the meaning. But I don't think we should object to combining B, I, and TT with poorly supported phrase elements (e.g., using I with Q or INS), nor to using B, I, or TT in place of SPAN. >> The BORDER attribute of TABLE is also not deprecated. Given the weak >> browser support for style sheets (particularly with borders and tables), I >> don't see the harm in using the BORDER attribute. > >How about [Interim] and then CSS2 ? I guess... But is there really any accessibility harm in an author specifying table borders in HTML? >> > use proper Quotations: BLOCKQUOTE and Q elements >> >> Is it too early to recommend using Q when almost no browsers support it? > >How about [New] ? Sounds good. -- Liam Quinn Web Design Group Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development http://www.htmlhelp.com/ http://enhanced-designs.com/
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 1998 08:53:11 UTC