- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 08:14:25 +1000 (EST)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
E2 -use a valid DTD should be a Priority 1. Non-valid markup excludes an audience which uses UA xyz, unless we are asserting that all current UAs can cope with it... How complex is a complex frame arrangement? two frames are often used so one provides navigationh and the other provides content. But not always by any means. Three frames opens heaps of possibilities - two navigation sets, a non-functional banner, are two which spring to mind as real examples. I feel that all framesets should have meta-information available. Tables are a bit different - there needs to be a real discussion. Should there be a list of Don'ts? I know that it is not popular on its own, but for people who don't really know much about HTML (and there are thousandsof those in Australia generating web content for important services) it would probably be helpful. Or should that be outside the scope of a W3C recommendation? Could the ratings go after the contents? Just some first thoughts. It basically looks really good. Charles McCN
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 1998 18:36:26 UTC