EARL Re: ERT WG: Agenda

Having worked with a number of implementations of the current spec, I  
think the first thing that is crucial is to publish, as fast as possible,  
a new working draft with a schema that works.

The current schema has some typos that make it not well-formed XML.

If we pulished this without any other updates, it should take a few hours  
of work over a few days, and I would like to see a milestone of publishing  
this super-minimal change by the technical plenary.

Should the EARL vocabulary should replicate things that are commonly done  
in others (Dublin Core, FOAF spring to mind)? I strongly believe it should  
not - where it makes sense, we should drop the new terms (such as date,  
Person, name) for ongoing work.

Then there are the big questions... :-)

cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:20:00 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> 4. Initial Discussion on EARL
>   - where are we with the current spec?
>   - where do we want to go with EARL?
>   - which milestones do we need to lay out?



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile - Vice Presidente - Fundacion Sidar
charles@sidar.org                      http://www.sidar.org
     (chaals is available for consulting at the moment)

Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 14:01:50 UTC