- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:01:01 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Cc: "nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: > > Ian, from your message it seems that severity is only intended to be used > with pass or fail and not with notTested, notApplicable, and > cannotTell. Can you confirm this? Sort-of. notTested is a special case of lack of a result. notApplicable is fail severity 0%. cannotTell is pass or fail (depending on which is the 'default') with confidence 0%. Whether it is pass or fail depends on the test, e.g. a test which of stylesheet linking may test that a stylesheet is not linked in certain error conditions, in which case you couldn't tell the difference between the UA passing the test and the UA not supporting stylesheets, so the result would be Pass with confidence 0%. (An outright fail would be obvious as the stylesheet _would_ be linked.) At least, that's how I store the data in my database: as either pass or fail, with numeric severities and confidences. In practice, though, there are only a certain number of states which can occur in my system: 1 passed completely PASS 2 passed with unrelated errors PASS 3 passed partially PASS 4 either passed or not implemented CAN'T TELL 5 not implemented at all NOT APPLICABLE 6 either failed or not implemented CAN'T TELL 7 failed FAIL 8 failed so badly the feature is unusable FAIL 9 crash FAIL Each of these (especially 2, 3, 7 and 8) usually have associated free-form comments explaining exactly what the error was. So I would probably be happy simply using Charles' idea of scrapping severity and confidence and explicitly calling out the 9 values. (10 if you include the "NOT TESTED" non-value.) As Charles said, the confidence issue can probably be out-sourced to some other RDF vocabulary. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 12:01:04 UTC