- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 02:48:30 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > Hi Nick, > > > I've tinkered a little more with it since our earlier discussion. > > <earl:validity > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#fails"/> > > should be:- > > <earl:validity > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#Fail"/> > > Apart from that, it seems alright: good work. Thanks. Will fix that next time I log in and tinker with it. > > I have implemented Jim's suggestion of accepting > > Content-Location as an identifier. > > What's all this about using Content-Location? The webservice parses XML you POST to it. That is to say, anonymous input. It assigns it a system identifier of modxml:input. Jim wanted to be able to post a document from a URL, and have the results refer to that URL. So we decided in chat to use the Content-Location HTTP header. If the Client sets a Content-Location, mod_xml will (now) use that as the System Identifier of the input. -- Nick Kew Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup, etc.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 21:48:36 UTC