- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 01:18:52 +0100
- To: "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Hi Nick, > I've tinkered a little more with it since our earlier discussion. In the current Valet output, the following:- <earl:validity rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#fails"/> should be:- <earl:validity rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#Fail"/> Apart from that, it seems alright: good work. > I have implemented Jim's suggestion of accepting > Content-Location as an identifier. What's all this about using Content-Location? I'm not sure what you mean, but note that "Content-Location" simply points to a resource whose associated representations are the same as the subject resource. It does not mean that the resources are equivalent, necessarily, from the Semantic Web/RDF point of view. It one of those points that could only ever get raised on an RDF list, though. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 20:18:56 UTC