- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:57:45 +0100
- To: "Dave Pawson" <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Jun/ > att-0037/01-simpleEarl> Cool stuff. The idea for a linear version of EARL in XML has been floating around for a long time, but this is the most comprehensive schema so far. In fact, the use of para in some of the documentationproperties is an extension: I hadn't thought about allowing XML structures in there (although that's an RDF grey area). The same kind of issues raised about http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Jun/0029 apply here: that an abbreviated syntax is not useful for the majority of people that automatically produce EARL; that validation is the main advantage, as long as a standard transformation is used; that consensus must be reached upon the level of features to be included in the linear format. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 13:58:09 UTC