- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 09:35:17 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
>>BTW, is this now a WCAG issue? > >it's always been a WCAG issue. It's a WCAG 1.0 checkpoint [1] and thus was >incorporated into WCAG 2.0 [2]. I sent the question to this list since >WCAG is trying to figure out methods to test to add to our success criteria. I meant that it is an issue to have this unnecessary checkpoint in WCAG. My point, and I think Nick's, was that it should not be in WCAG, and we should not be trying to find methods to test to add to the WCAG success criteria because it is not a content responsibility. Flicker is handled by the display's __mhz and the browser - so there is no requirement on the author. Please understand that photosensitive epilepsy is a real issue, but it doesn't belong in WCAG. Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 09:35:57 UTC