- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 23:21:32 +0100 (BST)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: > > The holy grail in testing tools seems to be an automatic test for flicker > that could be dangerous for someone with photosensitive epilepsy. > > Does anyone know of a tool that tests for flicker? mmmph ... could ask on sci.image.processing, but it sounds unlikely. Valet can be set to warn about it for every object that might cause a problem (OTTOMH img/object/applet), but doesn't actually test the content. > Information on photosensitive epilepsy. [2] IMO that belongs more in UAAG: a person with epilepsy would be well- advised to use a browser that doesn't expose him/her to the risk, regardless of webcontent. > [2] http://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/photofrm.html I'd want a qualified quack on the team, rather than relying on a website (however respectable) for such a critical development. -- Nick Kew Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup, etc.
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 18:21:40 UTC