- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:07:57 -0500 (EST)
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Well, the benefit of XHTML+EARL is that it could provide a simple solution
for the authoring phase. But I think it is not a really smart solution, and
what we want is to provide a pointer to metadata (unfortunately XHTML so far
isn't too smart about being able to do this).
But that is really a question of how you deal with the output of the earl
process - it must be relatively simple to instead pipe it somewhere else.
chaals
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Nick Kew wrote:
The approach here is to embed the RDF in the <head> of an XHTML doc.
The RDF is sort-of based on some of Sean's examples, but I'm not
currently in a fit state to work out if it makes sense (it
probably doesn't).
So my questions:
(1) Is this basic XHTML+EARL type of approach any use to anyone?
(3) Where next?
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 07:08:58 UTC