- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:22:45 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
"Nick Kew": > > I have one question, that you're probably best served to answer - How do I > > combine two EARL reports, say a validation pass, but then a human coming > > in and saying, No, that's no good it fails WCAG 3.1 - how would I combine > > those in a single EARL report? - at the moment I was just going to use my > > moomin report as a catchall for a whole basket, but I might aswell do it > > properly and actually collate the reports of different test tools into > > one. > > That looks like an agenda item for next meeting. I'm now rewriting the backend so that it stores things in a more combinable and searchable format, and is this the right method for combining multiple pass/fails in a single assertion? http://www.e-media.co.uk/earldev/query.asp?http://jibbering.com/ It passes the validator, but I'm not to sure about the graph, (mind you I'm not too sure about the graph when there's only one - I think my RDF understanding isn't completely there.) The idea is that people upload EARL reports, I extract the predicates, and then just serve up this combination, making the full reports available from the "moomin:original" url - perhaps adding in other properties identifying which validator and things. Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 14:24:52 UTC