- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 01:54:29 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Jim Ley wrote: > Yep, I would've put out a robot harvesting a few likely sites into the DB, > but as it's reliant on Nick's service, I didn't want to send a robot > against it without his agreement Aaargh ... now I'll have to find time to look at it so I know what you're talking about! > and also thought it might be worthwhile > waiting until the check is more exhaustive than just a validation which is > of little real world use to people browsing. OK, OK. I wasn't going to go public with this yet, but there's a nascent tool at <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/xslt/waitest.html> you might like to look at. With a suitable XSLT it will generate EARL, but (as with the validator) I need to figure out what the EARL reports will look like. Any input to that (sbp? aaronsw? jim?) will be appreciated. > I have one question, that you're probably best served to answer - How do I > combine two EARL reports, say a validation pass, but then a human coming > in and saying, No, that's no good it fails WCAG 3.1 - how would I combine > those in a single EARL report? - at the moment I was just going to use my > moomin report as a catchall for a whole basket, but I might aswell do it > properly and actually collate the reports of different test tools into > one. That looks like an agenda item for next meeting. BTW - Jim - why not join us on IRC? -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the essential service for anyone with a website. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 20:54:35 UTC