- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:29:55 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
I recently had to come up with some examples of EARL for someone asking aabout using it in the W3C Validator... here's what I came up with:- 1) Valid HTML 4.01:- @prefix earl: <http://www.w3.org/2001/02/earl/> . <http://validator.w3.org/> earl:asserts { <http://www.w3.org/test/> earl:conformsTo <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401> . } . 2) Invalid XHTML 1.0 (we're working on syntax for broken XML, using BNF):- @prefix earl: <http://www.w3.org/2001/02/earl/> . @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.n3> . @prefix xhtml: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml> . <http://validator.w3.org/> earl:asserts { { <http://www.w3.org/test/> earl:conformsTo <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1> . } a log:falsehood . } . <http://www.w3.org/test/[@src="w3c.gif"]> earl:missing xhtml:@alt . It's missing an alt attribute on that particular image! 3) Valid (and well formed) XML doc (http://www.w3.org/test.xml - schema http://www.w3.org/schema.xsd):- @prefix earl: <http://www.w3.org/2001/02/earl/> . <http://validator.w3.org/> earl:asserts { <http://www.w3.org/test/> earl:conformsTo <http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210>; earl:comment "is well formed XML" . } . <http://validator.w3.org/> earl:asserts { <http://www.w3.org/test/> earl:conformsTo <http://www.w3.org/schema.xsd>; earl:comment "is valid XML" . } . The second one is rather close to Wendy's example :-) -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 26 February 2001 09:30:56 UTC