- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 07:17:03 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I'm starting a thread on notation issues to keep it out of the more substantive issues Sean wrote: >I get a bit messed up with Seth Russell's semEnglish >language, which he evolved from Notation3. There, you can use [] for almost >anything, depending upon the amount of elements inside. For example, one >element is a URI, two is (p,o), three is a triple, and so on. That sounds like an improvement. It bothered me to use commas, semicolons, square brackets, or curley brackets depending on how many elements you were factoring out. semEngish sounds simpler syntactically, more lisp-ish. Do you have a pointer to it? Should we switch to semEnglish? Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 07:16:58 UTC