- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:58:16 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Jim Ley wrote: > "Sean B. Palmer": > > > > 03:15:33 <sbp> * Remove testSubject > > > > 03:15:40 <sbp> * Add reprOf > > > > A resource is a thread; it has a number of entities > > corresponsing to it over time. > > Certainly, although I don't see how we, when we're external to the > resource, can know enough to state that some resource is newer version of > the old. This is an assertion. In the context of what I'm doing, the webmaster asserts "this update deals with that problem report" (may be more than one; may iterate, etc). But I'd like something a bit more specific than *just* an assertion. A formalism for expressing this relationship. Threading would indeed meet this need. -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the essential service for anyone with a website. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 10:01:28 UTC