- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:58:47 -0700
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 12:07 PM -0400 9/18/00, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >For example, issue #42. Attaching semantics to classes had a lot of >discussion on the WCAG list, but was it resolved? Len - did you >receive a satisfactory answer? Seems to me it was still being >discussed. In my opinion the issue was not sufficiently resolved and while I like Len a lot, I don't like his proposal. :) I feel that exposing the arbitrary inner workings of HTML and CSS to the end user -- i.e. by identifying specific "classes" -- is a very poor solution to the problem of poor semantics in HTML code. A better solution would be to increase the semantical content of HTML markup, not try to modify CSS in the proposed manner. --Kynn -- -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 12:19:53 UTC