- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:39:12 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Tim, Thanks much for your proposal! Here's couple of intitial reactions First, a minor practical note: Would you resend the xml attachment with the suffix changed to .txt ? Otherwise, I get a browser error when I try to open it (browser insists on an XSL stylesheet). Very good point about difficulty of "repair" when the content is generated programmatically. As far as your note that combining the violations with the source creates problems of re-ordering, because of lack of functionality with XSLT and XPATH. Could that be handled with a separate filter (e.g. Perl using XML::Parser)? There's the other method of pointing into the source with XPATH, like Al mentioned. Would these be semantically equivalent, e.g. you could convert form one into another? Or are there some fundamental differences in capabilities from those schemes? Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 11:47:11 UTC