Re: Integration of AERT into AU techniques

Jan,
Looking good.  One suggestion: in guideline 3 you have the more generic

"prompt the author..."

e.g.

            Prompt the author to identify the type of image (decorative, a 
navigation icon, etc.).

While in the new section 4 you've inherited the "suggested messages" that 
we had in there, e.g.
    * Suggested Messages:
        * "Missing text equivalent: Missing text equivalent for image."
Personally speaking, I like the generic way rather than the "suggested 
wording".  Even if we tell the author it's only suggested, they might feel 
limited.  I think this was where we were headed while AERT was over here in 
ER...

Len
--
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple 
University
(215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday         mailto:kasday@acm.org

Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/

The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: 
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/