- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:37:46 -0400
- To: "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
> For example, if a form uses a button that triggers javascript, then when > you turn off javascript you will need to have a SUBMIT button instead. > Hmmm, that would be the text equivalent of the script and fulfills technique 1.1.10. But what about the required server verification of the fields - it's not covered by 1.1.10? I'm questioning whether you can have a text equiv for a programmatic object yet the page is unusable when the object is turned off. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org> To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>; "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 9:58 AM Subject: Re: Technique 6.3.1 [priority 1] Verify that the page is usable when programmatic objects are disabled. > Sometimes you need more than a text equivalent to make a page usable with > programmatic objects are disabled. > > For example, if a form uses a button that triggers javascript, then when > you turn off javascript you will need to have a SUBMIT button instead. > > This often comes up when the javasrcript is used to verify the > fields. This means then when you replace it with the submit button, that > field verification has to be moved to the server, e.g. to a CGI > script (this is something a good programmer would want to do anyway). So > the user really has to check server functionality here. > > (In principle, we'd want the tool to check the server code, probably by > black box testing. If we don't get into that now, perhaps we should add a > section to point out explicity that we're not getting into this. > > Len > > At 04:43 PM 7/24/00 -0400, Chris Ridpath wrote: > >It looks to me that technique 6.3.1 (verify that the page is usable when > >programmatic objects are disabled) is covered by technique 1.1 (Provide a > >text equivalent for every non-text element). The specific techniques are: > > > >1.1.4 [priority 1] Check APPLET elements... > >1.1.5 [priority 1] Check OBJECT elements... > >1.1.10 [priority 1] Check SCRIPT elements... > > > >If we have a text equivalent for the programmatic object then the page is > >usable when the programmatic object is disabled. > > > >Make sense? > > > >Chris > > -- > Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. > Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and > Department of Electrical Engineering > Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 > > kasday@acm.org > http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday > > (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) > > The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: > http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/ >
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2000 13:38:06 UTC