- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:58:23 -0400
- To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Sometimes you need more than a text equivalent to make a page usable with programmatic objects are disabled. For example, if a form uses a button that triggers javascript, then when you turn off javascript you will need to have a SUBMIT button instead. This often comes up when the javasrcript is used to verify the fields. This means then when you replace it with the submit button, that field verification has to be moved to the server, e.g. to a CGI script (this is something a good programmer would want to do anyway). So the user really has to check server functionality here. (In principle, we'd want the tool to check the server code, probably by black box testing. If we don't get into that now, perhaps we should add a section to point out explicity that we're not getting into this. Len At 04:43 PM 7/24/00 -0400, Chris Ridpath wrote: >It looks to me that technique 6.3.1 (verify that the page is usable when >programmatic objects are disabled) is covered by technique 1.1 (Provide a >text equivalent for every non-text element). The specific techniques are: > >1.1.4 [priority 1] Check APPLET elements... >1.1.5 [priority 1] Check OBJECT elements... >1.1.10 [priority 1] Check SCRIPT elements... > >If we have a text equivalent for the programmatic object then the page is >usable when the programmatic object is disabled. > >Make sense? > >Chris -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2000 09:56:56 UTC