- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:27:34 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
How about: Techniques for evaluation and repair of *accessible* web content. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org> To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 12:11 PM Subject: Title of the techniques document > Hello, > > we discussed the title of the document at today's teleconference. The > following proposals were made: > > * "Techniques for evaluation and repair of Web content" > * "Evaluation and Repair tool accessibility guidelines" > > The first proposal does not address that we are focusing on accessibility > while the second implies that we are looking at the whole tool for > accessibility like the authoring tool guidelines. > > other proposals? thoughts? > > --wendy > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > madison, wi usa > tel: +1 608 663 6346 > /--
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 12:27:54 UTC