- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:58:52 -0500
- To: "wai-wcag-editor@w3.org" <wai-wcag-editor@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Well, I looked at Netscape communicator 4.7 and the color bug is still there... my color doesn't override, even though there's a checkbox to do so. It doesn't change the size either...I don't know if that's a bug or lack of a feature... the wording is ambiguous. And since the future is moving toward style sheets, it seems unlikely that NN will ever get fixed. So I'm going to back off from my objection to 3.3. Sorry for the fuss... Len Checkpoint 3.3 says Use style sheets to control layout and presentation. [Priority 2] For example, use the CSS 'font' property instead of the HTML FONT element to contro font styles. This implies that we should not do the following <H1> <font size="+1" color="green"> The Gadfly </font> </H1> I don't see any practical consequences of doing this. We're specifying the logical classification of the text via H1. Screenreaders will ignore the font. People with low vision can override the font. So what's the harm? I don't think we should rule out such cases. There's just one problem I can think of, a bug in some versions of Navigator that don't fully override colors, even though there's a menu item to do that. I've come across that in the past. But at most, that means that you should precede this with "Until user agents fix bugs in allowing users to override font sizes and colors....". And even then, do we know that style sheet override doesn't have bugs of it's own? Plus, even though we have to worry about features that are just plain absent, I don't think we should worry too much about every bug in every browser or screenreader... the added complexity and just isn't worth it I think. Len ------- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2000 11:56:29 UTC