- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 14:53:17 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
There is a tradeoff between making an email message clear on its own and making it work with desktop tools in the process of editing a document. Jonathan wrote: >Subject: please put a precis in the header and/or at the top of the email > >I do like the way this discussion is going. >However I still complain about excessive use of "1.13" etc in my email/on >the wai site. I simply am not aware of what you speak. > For example, one subject line reads: "Technique 1.1.7 [priority 1] Verify that text equivalents are provided for audio files where necessary" Where the topic could be summarized as "Text equivalents for audio" What Wendy used as her subject line is a literal cut of a technique title from the current draft of the ERT document. Using the exact text of the document makes it easy to find where one is in the cited document by using text searching, known as "Find" in the Windows environment. The context for the message has been invoked by title. This works well if one is reading this mail with a copy of the draft document open for comparison, and less well otherwise. One technique that can help is to write a topic paragraph for your post after you have written the detailed version, and to write or re-write the subject header as a concise title after that. The writing order should be the reverse of the reading order. In or adjacent to the topic paragraph is a good place to have something like the full text of the title for the corresponding section in the document being commented on. This is the plain text version of a link. Come to think of it, it should be a fully qualified reference including both the URL for the document and the text string to find. On the W3C site, references to other documents or sections by number should be accompanies with references by hyperlink, so one can visit the cited discussion and return, if desired. Al
Received on Saturday, 5 February 2000 14:45:49 UTC