- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:59:26 +0100
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
looks good, I'll read it soon, in the mean time, I searched a bit on the web for existing work in the area. I found the following of interest Test Case Markup & Cataloging, Tin Man edition http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xslt-conformance/200012/msg00000.html on the oasis-open mailing list for xslt conformance. Once we have something solid, I will contact this OASIS technical committee for coordination/cooperation (need to do it anyway for the W3C QA activity) > In accordance with the action item I took on from the f2f, I have > published an overview/summary of EDL:- > > EDL - Evaluation Description Language > http://infomesh.net/edl/ > > The best part of the document is the formal description of EDL: "Evaluation > Description Language is an RDF based framework for recording, (and possibly > transferring and processing) data about automatic and manual evaluations of > resources. The purpose is to provide a framework for generic evaluation > description formats that can we used by "wizards/tools/humans"." > > The most useful point that is raises is the process aim. While I don't want > to rush anyone on that, it is something that really does need deciding. > Another good part of the document is the architecture overview (with > diagram!). Section 5.2 I think. > > The document is obviously not finished yet (!), and comments etc. are highly > welcome. > > Kindest Regards, > Sean B. Palmer > http://www.mysterylights.com/sbp/ > "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." > - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 09:00:53 UTC