- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:46:43 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Hello, Perhaps we should be more involved in the discussions on the w3c-rdf-interest list? [1] There is currently a thread started by Dan Brickley called, "'Semantic Web Accessibility'? - notes on XSLT and Schematron-RDF." Has everyone downloaded and played with the Schematron? I think everyone should. It raises interesting questions like: 1. instead of writing a "prose" document like the ERT, should we create a schema (basically a set of rules) like he has already done for WCAG? [2] 2. we have talked briefly about a technique that would use RDF to keep track of what tests a site/page has passed. Could we build on the schematron for this? 3. In Dan's original post [3] he says, "XSLT has great expressive power that can be easily applied to extracting / summarising and analysing XML web content into an RDF-processable form. Progress with this, for semantic web and WAI efforts, might be made easier if we had some taxonomy of XSLT stylesheets, so that an RDF agent could select appropriate stylesheets according to task at hand." If our tools summarized the analysis into an RDF-processable form, then data could be shared between tools. This has also been discussed on the list. Thoughts?? Ideas for discussion at the Face2face? --wendy [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Apr/ [2] http://www.ascc.net/xml/resource/schematron/WAI-example.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Apr/0024.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Monday, 10 April 2000 13:38:59 UTC