W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > October 1999

Re: BLINK repair mechanisms (calling all CSS gurus!)

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:05:07 +0200
Message-Id: <199910200705.JAA28062@zidane.inria.fr>
To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>
cc: Evaluation & Repair Interest Group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>

> blink 
>         Text blinks (alternates between visible and invisible). 
>         Conforming user agents are not required to support 
>         this value. 

this just means it's not part of a conformance criteria.

> so, am i correct in concluding that there is no "approved" CSS equiv
> for BLINK 

there is an approved one, but in order to claim CSS2 conformance, you
don't need to implement it

I think it's ok to tell people to use it; as you said, no big deal if
it doesn't work.
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 1999 03:05:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:30:00 UTC