- From: Michael Cooper <mcooper@cast.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 15:49:10 -0500
- To: dd@w3.org, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Let me make a quick response to this from the Bobby perspective. Like many of us, I am headed out the door to CSUN and will be able to make a more in-depth response when I return. I like your thoughts on which priority 1 guidelines could be automatically checked, and in most cases I agree in the hypothetical sense. Bobby, however, cannot check some of those because of the way it "sees" HTML right now. There are other things that we haven't had time to add support for but should soon. I can provide a list of what it supports after CSUN, and at that time can also comment on what I think it will be able to support in the future. Hopefully that list and your list would be very similar, which means we're doing a good job. There is a need for some work on it and you already gave me a couple new ideas... Michael At 11:25 AM 3/15/99 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >> With first cut at to answer: Can these be automatically validated for >> priority 1 checkpoints? > >I like the idea of going over the checkpoints and check their >automatisation. > >But before starting a project of that nature, I'd like to make sure >Michael Cooper (Bobby lead) can participate in the discussions. > >So Michael, can I add you to the distribution list of this mailing >list ? > >Archives are at > http://cgi.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/ > >Len's original message is: > http://cgi.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/1999Mar/0065.html > > Michael Cooper CAST 39 Cross St Peabody, MA 01960 978 531 8555 x265 mcooper@cast.org http://www.cast.org/
Received on Monday, 15 March 1999 15:51:03 UTC