- From: Silas S. Brown <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:51:28 +0000
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- CC: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> So I guess at this point it doesn't handle frames? It does. The default behaviour is to linearise all the frames, but you can also choose to get it to leave them untouched. The problem was that www.temple.edu is actually now a no frames site, and I hadn't thought of following the link to the frames version. Anyway, unfortunately the gateway didn't work because the URLs were not as separate parameters but embedded in the value with two backslashes. I'm not sure whether to try and parse this kind of thing or not; it seems a little special-case. If it's any help I could attempt to write some code that recognises a URL in plain text when it sees one (like mailer programs do), but this still wouldn't get rid of the backslashes. (Only I can't do anything now because I'm a bit loaded down.) You're right there's not that much I can do about the duplicates on AT&T I'm afraid. I can look for duplicate URLs no problem, but it's possible that in some circumstances they will actually be wanted and it seems too risky. Regards -- Silas S Brown, St John's College Cambridge UK http://epona.ucam.org/~ssb22/ "Never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties" - Matthew 6:34 "I try to take one day at a time, but lately several days have attacked me at once" - Paul Denegri
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 1999 12:52:06 UTC