- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:04:11 +0200
- To: Peter Verhoeven <pav@oce.nl>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> webmaster is clear. I'm only not som happy with the attachment of the Bobby > report that is included. As I told to the developers of Bobby, Bobby works > not well on a lot of websites. For example if somebody wants to access > http://www.vpro.nl with Lynx or another browser with loading images off. It > is realy nearly impossible to access this website. Bobby says > congratulations no accessibility errors. If you send such an attachment to > the webmaster he gets a message that there are some accessibility errors > and an attachment that tells him congratulations. Good point. In investigating which short form of Bobby report we attach to the report, I think we should be careful to just report facts, and not subjective judgement, ala "Congrat", etc. This way if Bobby doesn't find anything, the Bobby report will "just" be empty. > I think it is better to > make such an attachment optional. It is optional, turned ON by default. Are you asking that it be turned off by default ? It was off, but some people argued the other way and that's why I changed it to be ON...
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 1998 05:04:21 UTC