- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 12:50:35 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 09:10 AM 12/14/98 -0500, you wrote: > >For version 1 of the A-Prompt we won't be able to implement the XML idea you >suggested. We've already got our simple text file working. Perhaps for >version 2?? > ><img-alt-use> ><img-src>[URI]</img-src> ><alt-text>[text]</alt-text> ><as-used-in>[URI]</as-used-in> ></img-alt-use> No problem, here. Information content requirements (including unique or not-unique rules) should come from the application scenarios, i.e. ER-IG consensus. These are still under discussion IIRC. See thread David started on does the user mode ever involve multiple choices? Data format details (XML-ish or not) should be decided by the specific toolsmiths that have signed up to interface their tools to a given data object [or WG consensus if there are enough of them]. So far this is you and Michael. Al
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 1998 12:49:42 UTC