Looks good to me. Only comment: "Late comments would delay the standard." should be "Late comments may not be able to be considered in time to be addressed in this version of WCAG." I do not want to imply any opportunity for people to try to delay us. Michael On 3/9/2017 8:11 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: > Hi all, > > I am updating "What about WCAG 2.1?" at > https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq#v21 > > Suggestions for edits very welcome. > > (The WCAG Overview links to that FAQ question under "WCAG 2.1 and > other guidelines" <https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag#wcag21> -- rather > than have redundant info in both places.) > > Best, > ~Shawn > > > > >Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 02:38:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:53 UTC