- From: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:04:00 +0200
- To: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kevin White" <kevin@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6A8EDD04-5BB0-4EF3-8AF1-319F3F24B79A@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, See comments below: On 11 Jul 2014, at 16:23, Shawn Henry wrote: > Kevin White wrote: >> Some minor things: >> First para: >> "… and improves the user experience for all audiences." >> to >> "… and improve the user experience for all audiences." > > I also stumbled on this sentence and started to suggest an correction, > but then realized that technically it was correct. > Sentence before edit: "These tutorials show you how to create web > content that is accessible to people with disabilities and improves > the user experience for all audiences." > Breaks down to: ... content that is accessible... and [that] improves > the user experience for all > > While it is grammatically correct, it doesn't flow well and I think we > want the first sentence of the tutorials to flow well. :) > > Playing with ideas: > 1. These tutorials show you how to create web content that is > accessible to people with disabilities and that improves the user > experience for all audiences. > 2. These tutorials show you how to create web content that is > accessible to people with disabilities, which improves the user > experience for all audiences. > *Tangent* Do we want to say "users" instead of "audiences" here? The > primary target audience of the tutorials is developers and it seems > "users" might be better for them? Or even "everybody"? > 3. These tutorials show you how to create web content that is > accessible to people with disabilities and [that] provides a better > user experience for everyone. > *Tangent* Given the primary target audience of the tutorials is > developers, should we say "develop" instead of "create"? > 4. These tutorials show you how to develop web content that is > accessible to people with disabilities and [that] provides a better > user experience for everyone. > (I can't decide whether it's better with the "that" or not...) > 5. ... > *EOWG*: Other ideas? I have changed the text to number 4, as I think it's the most concise one of the ideas you've been playing with. > >> ‘All Tutorials’ seems a bit passive to me… not sure what I >> would use instead … just jars a little I guess. > > I also didn't like "All Tutorials". Maybe "Tutorial Topics"? I have changed the headache to “tutorial topics”. I'm fine with it but open for other suggestions. > > Best, > ~Shawn -- Eric Eggert, Web Accessibility Specialist WAI-ACT Project I’m yatil on IRC.
Received on Saturday, 19 July 2014 09:04:36 UTC