- From: Wayne E Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:45:22 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 04:45:53 UTC
I am good with the suggested wording. Recently I have decided to simply state WCAG 2.0 Accessibiy when that is meant. It is not equal to accessibility by a long shot. So, I thinkif we are speaking about WCAG 2.0 it is always best to reverence WCAG 2.0 as narrowly as possibile. That way it will not be confused with actual accessibility. Wayne
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 04:45:53 UTC