W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: EOWG quick action for all - including list lurkers

From: Alan Chuter <achuter1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:55:26 +0200
Message-ID: <51FBF28E.9090402@gmail.com>
CC: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello all, from one of the list lurkers,

I agree with Andrew that the "Techniques are Informative" section refers
to "Sufficient Techniques."

Advisory Techniques and Failures are by nature not required. I assume
that using a separate section is to emphasize the notes, but on first
reading I found the section heading a little confusing, especially as
it's followed by so many other headings, all with the word "Techniques."
It rather upsets the flow of ideas to have a disclaimer as the first

I think it would be more coherent to make it a subsection of "Sufficient



On 02/08/2013 17:25, Shawn Henry wrote:
> Hi EOWG list folks,
> WCAG WG would like more input on one small point - where to put a Note
> in the "Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria" section.
> The question is at:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WCAG_review#Question:_Where_does_this_Note_fit_better.3F>
> Would you take a few mins to read this and think about it?
> If you're not an active participant in EOWG and cannot edit the
> wiki,*please reply to this e-mail with your thoughts*.
> Thanks!
> ~Shawn
Received on Friday, 2 August 2013 17:56:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:47 UTC