W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: EOWG quick action for all - including list lurkers

From: Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:24:25 -0400
Message-ID: <51FBEB49.4080105@catherine-roy.net>
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org

I agree with Sailesh in that it could stay where it is but needs to 
stand out more. If it is moved to the sufficient techniques section, it 
should still be made to stand out. I think the idea that W3C cautions 
against something is a pretty strong statement and it is important that 
it not be missed. Perhaps that sentence or the words "cautions against" 
should be marked up in strong.

Best regards,


Catherine Roy

On 02/08/2013 12:08 PM, Sailesh Panchang wrote:
> Shawn,
> It is ok where it is but should be worded as "It is important to note
> that ...", instead of just "Note:". Notes like those are generally
> considered supplementary  / advisory info and can be missed easily.
> Alternatively it should be moved up in that section nearer to the
> beginning and not be called a "Note".
> Sailesh
> On 8/2/13, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
>> Hi EOWG list folks,
>> WCAG WG would like more input on one small point - where to put a Note in
>> the "Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria" section.
>> The question is at:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WCAG_review#Question:_Where_does_this_Note_fit_better.3F>
>> Would you take a few mins to read this and think about it?
>> If you're not an active participant in EOWG and cannot edit the wiki,*please
>> reply to this e-mail with your thoughts*.
>> Thanks!
>> ~Shawn
Received on Friday, 2 August 2013 17:25:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:47 UTC