- From: Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:41:08 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
hello again Shawn, As everthing is fixed, I think the page looks really good and what is ready should be published. Some replies below with SD. Sylvie Le 02/07/2013 16:22, Shawn Henry a écrit : >> 1. In the introduction: >> "people can interact with them using only the keyboard, using voice >> input, and using screen readers. >> I would suggest to write the word using only once. >> This would read: people can interact with them using only the >> keyboard, voice input, or screen readers." > > SLH: I tried this but I don't think it's clear enough for people who > don't know about accessibility and other ways to interact with the > computers. I think we'd need to say: "people can interact with them > using only the keyboard, or voice input, or using screen readers." but > then it could be understood as "using only the keyboard, or using only > voice input, or using only screen readers" which isn't right either. SD: This suggestion was only to avoid repeating a word too much. If you think this formulation is clearer, you are a better expert in English than I am. So I don't mind letting the text as is. >> 3. In the next bullet: >> "Check that every field label has label for="[acme]" before it and >> id="[acme]" in the box with it, and that the text in quotes matches. >> [@@ work with screen reader?]" >> I think we should explain that acme is an example of id content and >> that people do not have to look for this string. I will check with >> screen readers later today on till the end of the week. > > SLH: I changed it back to "x" and added: ("x" can be anything; for > example, for="park", id="park") SD: Yes, this is clearer now. >> 5. In checking with FF, I am not sure it is a good idea to write the >> warning in parenthesis. In French, parenthesis is often used for >> additional content that does not need to be read absolutely but that >> can be skipped. Why don't we write a note ? >> Note: There is not an easy way to check form control labels with the >> FF toolbar. The Form Labels favelet works with Firefox and provides >> the same information as from IE WAT above. It requires installation." >> Couldn't we explain what this favelet is? > > SLH: I took it out of parenthesis and tweaked it a bit to be a little > more clear what the favlet does. SD: Fine! >> In Plain content view: >> In the French Web developer toolbar, there is a shortcut to disable >> all styles. It is: alt+shift+a. May be it is the same in the English >> version? > > SLH: Right. I saw where you put that in the wiki a while ago. It didn't > work for Wayne or me in the English version. SD: It's strange that there is no direct shortcut because it is faster to only press one instead of going to the web developer submenu. But I think one can assign a shortcut to this functionality in the developer's option. Best Sylvie
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 14:35:20 UTC