- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:30:34 -0500
- To: Wayne Dick <Wayne.Dick@csulb.edu>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Thanks Sharron & Wayne for drafting! I took another edit pass to try to simplify it even more. For example, I'm not sure if people would understand the two and one dimensional presentation. Draft at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/checks#l> Questions for EOWG consideration and comment in the wiki at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Easy_Checks#Comments_on_Linearize> ~Shawn On 6/11/2013 2:31 PM, Wayne Dick wrote: > I have worked on the linearize the page section, and believe it should > be included in easy checks. > > Here it is. Please read and comment. For conversion to alternative > media, not single property is more important than the ability to > linearize rationally. As stated the process is "easy" and the > interpretation is easy as well. Removing images does two things. 1) it > reveals text alternatives and 2) it removes the clutter of weird image > layouts when they are linearized. This latter feature makes the text > usable by a beginner. > > Here is the proposed section. Wayne > > > > Linearize the Page for Experiential Learning (Optional) > > When a page is converted form text to speech, to Braille, or to very > large print, the author's two dimensional presentation format breaks > down. Before a page can be converted to an appropriate medium it must > be reduced to a one dimensional information stream. This process is > called linearizing the page. > > Not everyone has access to a screen reader, or powerful text > customization tools required to experience linearized content as it is > used, but a linearized presentation of content is easy to simulate > using the tools we have introduced so far. This can give the fully > sighted reader an understanding of the day to day experience of users > with blindness or low vision. > > Linearization does not focus on any one success criterion, instead it > reveals how well a page is organized to support accessibility. > Example: Read the linearized view of the inaccessible version in the > BAD Demo. That will be fun, and it reveals a lot of what can go wrong. > > The checks below provide instructions with different browsers for how to: > > 1. Unclutter the linear view and expose text alternatives by removing images > 2. Reveal the reading order by turning off the associated style sheets, > 3. Expose navigation support for a one dimensional content format, and > 4. Reveal the resulting page display for an approximation of a > screen reader / customized text experience. > > To linearize with IE WAT > > 1. Open the page you are checking in the IE browser > 2. Using the toolbar, choose Images > Remove Images > 3. Next choose CSS > Disable CSS > > Shortcuts in WAT toolbar are: With keyboard press ctrl+alt+shift+s to > display the options dialog box and uncheck the boxes "Images" and > "CSS", then select "ok".. {Sylvie, June 6} > To linearize with FF web developer toolbar > > 1. Open the page you are checking in the FF browser > 2. Using the toolbar, choose Images > Disable Images > 3. Next choose CSS > Disable Styles > Disable All Styles > > In the French Web Developer version the keyboard shortcut to hide CSS > is alt+shift+a, but I am not sure if it is the same in the American > English one. For disabling images, I only have the French version's > shortcuts here. {Sylvie, June 6}. This doesn't work in the English > version {Wayne, June 11} > What to check for: > > Read through the resulting display and notice the following: > > 1. Make sure that there is text in place of any meaningful images > and that the text provides the same information as the original. > (review alt text section above) > 2. Verify that the reading order is logical, complete, and makes sense. > 3 Make sure that navigation is feasible in a linear format. > > > On 6/10/13, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: >> EOWG, >> >> At the last teleconference, we talked about maybe including a list of some >> of the things that are *not* covered in Easy Checks. We could put that in >> the Next Steps section, e.g.: >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/checks#next> >> >> What do we want in that list? Please add to wiki at >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Easy_Checks#Next_Steps> >> >> Thanks! >> ~Shawn >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 19:30:44 UTC