- From: Cliff Tyllick <Cliff.Tyllick@tceq.texas.gov>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:27:57 -0600
- To: <shawn@w3.org>,<w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I don't know that I would call these "inspirations," but after reading the discussion y'all had about 1.3: Adaptable, I came up with these 155-characters-or-fewer "explanations": 1. Meaning and structure come through with any technology. 2. Content works, regardless of assistive technology used. 3. Content works with all interfaces and devices. 4. Content reconfigures for all interfaces and devices. 5. Content is reconfigurable for assistive technology. Nothing there that makes me shout "Eureka," but maybe one of these will trigger something for someone else. Cliff Cliff Tyllick Web development coordinator Agency Communications Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 512/239-4516 ctyllick@tceq.state.tx.us >>> Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> 02/11/11 12:02 PM >>> EOWG participants, Please review the updates to "WCAG 2.0 at a Glance" that are in the "Proposed changes" column in the [heading level 2] Comparison Table in the "Requirements/Analysis..." doc at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-quicktips#compare Please send to the EOWG mailing list your thoughts for: * 1.3 Adaptable: Create content that can be presented in different ways (for example simpler layout) without losing information or structure. * 4.1 Compatible: Maximize compatibility with current and future user agents, including assistive technologies. * Any others you're not comfortable with. Remember that we'd like to keep them each under 55 characters. Also note that the agenda for 18 February is updated at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#agenda Thanks, ~Shawn On 2/4/2011 12:25 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: > EOWG participants, > > The WCAG at a Glance agenda item for 4 February was postponed until 11 Feb, which gives you time to comment and prepare for discussion. > > Please consider the suggested revisions to "WCAG 2.0 at a Glance" that are in the "Notes for consideration" column in the [heading level 2] Comparison Table in the "Requirements/Analysis..." doc at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-quicktips#compare > > Please *send any thoughts in e-mail* by Thursday 10 Feb. > > Also note that the agenda for 11 February is updated at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#agenda > > Thanks, > ~Shawn
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 22:36:15 UTC