Re: 2 new slides RE: EOWG - Wrapping up Business Case slides

  Hi Bruno,

Thank you for checking. There are a couple of open issues that we are working on this week. I hope to have the final draft for EOWG approval by Monday (27 June). It would be best to wait a couple of days for that final draft.

Please make sure that what you share includes the opening slides (that lists To Do items) and the Status (that is on the title slide). The Status will still be "Draft" until EOWG approval, which I hope will be in July.

I'm glad that you find it useful and look forward to any feedback that you have.

Best regards,
~Shawn



On 6/22/2011 3:10 PM, Bruno von Niman wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> This is beginning to get to a level when I'd like to share IT with my team
> in charge of developing the accessibility requirements for European public
> procurement (Shadi is also a member of, see www.mandate376.eu).
>
> The purpose is inspiration and the sharing of good arguments.
> Would that be OK?
>
> Best regards,
> Bruno
> ETSI STF416 Expert
>
> On 21/06/11 21:01, "Shawn Henry"<shawn@w3.org>  wrote:
>
>>   EOWG,
>>
>> Slides:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format.ppt
>>
>> Please review the two new slides developed based on our last discussion
>> and comments in e-mail:
>> * Accessibility impacts image (currently 13)
>> * [broad benefits] (currently 30)
>>
>> Please remember to read the text for speakers/readers under the slide and
>> consider the slides in context of the overall presentation.
>>
>> Please comment on these *by Thursday 23 June*, or let me know if you need
>> more time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~Shawn
>>
>>
>> On 6/9/2011 5:05 PM, Shawn Henry wrote:
>>>   EOWG,
>>>
>>> We might not have time to discuss the business case slides on the
>>> teleconference for several weeks, and it would be good finish them asap.
>>> Therefore, please send any comments in e-mail.
>>>
>>> The 9 June version has a few minor changes in response to comments from
>>> Vicki and Alan, such as those listed here
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2011AprJun/0091.html
>>> Another minor change is the addition of /For more info:/ to some of the
>>> slide notes, and ------ fyi ------- to separate important information
>> >from additional info.
>>> Please review and comment on these latest changes:
>>> * Added image to "Reduces risk of legal action" slide (currently 13)
>>> * Added draft images for the "example: alt text for images" slides
>>> (currently 16-19) - along with "[OPEN:..." with what still needs to be
>>> fixed in them. (Thanks Wayne for continuing to work on them.)
>>> * Changed image in "Return for accessibility" slide (currently 26) (I
>>> left the old one at slide 27 for this review round, just so it's there
>>> for comparison).
>>>
>>> OPEN:
>>> 1. Volunteer needed to track down image permission. If we are likely to
>>> want to use the tree image on the "Return for accessibility" slide,
>>> would some one please chase down the owner and see if we can have
>>> permission to use it? It is used several places that come up in an
>>> images search for "tree investment" but I didn't get far enough to find
>>> the actual source.
>>> 2. Volunteer to make the HTML version after we have settled on the
>>> content, which I hope will be in June.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> ~Shawn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/31/2011 10:44 AM, Shawn Henry wrote:
>>>>
>>>> EOWG folks,
>>>>
>>>> Here are open action items for the business case slides:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. cost, investment, return slides - consider different illustrations,
>>>> review text.
>>>>
>>>> * Karl ­ provide idea of illustration "to make the graph look less
>>>> scientific and the implication that it is data-based"
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/05/06-eo-minutes>
>>>>
>>>> * Vicki ­ provide alternative ideas for slides
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/05/06-eo-minutes>
>>>>
>>>> * All ­ consider different illustrations and metaphors, including
>>>> further comment on or refinement of the idea of tree
>>>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2011AprJun/0025.html>
>>>>
>>>> * All ­ review revised Notes.
>>>>
>>>> 2. risk coverage in notes&/or slide ­ review draft slide, suggest
>>>> illustration.
>>>>
>>>> Since I didn¹t get any input on this following the 6 May
>>>> teleconference, I drafted a suggestion. It¹s currently slide 13 titled
>>>> ³Reduces risk of legal action².
>>>>
>>>> Read the discussion in minutes
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/05/06-eo-minutes#item02>  noting different
>>>> perspectives on how to cover this given the very different situation in
>>>> different countries, etc.
>>>>
>>>> (fyi, in the business case pages it is addressed at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/pol#risks and under ³Decreases potential
>>>> for high legal expenses² in http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/fin)
>>>>
>>>> * All - review draft slide, send any comments to list.
>>>>
>>>> * All - suggest illustrations, send to list for discussion.
>>>>
>>>> 3. images for alternative text.
>>>>
>>>> * Wayne ­ send drafts for group review.
>>>>
>>>> 4. CSS for HTML version.
>>>>
>>>> * Ian ­ fix last few things.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NOTES:
>>>>
>>>> * Along with any images or other visuals that you send for discussion,
>>>> include descriptions for those who cannot see them.
>>>>
>>>> * For those new to EOWG: it is probably good to send quick rough
>>>> drafts first, rather than spending a lot of time refining them. EOWG is
>>>> likely to have suggestions for revisions, or different ideas.
>>>>
>>>> * Download the latest version of the presentation, I'm editing it as
>>>> input comes in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> ~Shawn
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 23:56:00 UTC