- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:55:11 +0200
- To: "'Ian Pouncey'" <w3c@ipouncey.co.uk>, "'Shawn Henry'" <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "'EOWG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
+1 Emmanuelle -----Mensaje original----- De: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] En nombre de Ian Pouncey Enviado el: miércoles, 22 de septiembre de 2010 13:49 Para: Shawn Henry CC: EOWG (E-mail) Asunto: Re: Developing Websites for Older People comment reply Hi Shawn, I also approve of your response. It is interesting that Chris has the opposite opinion to me of recommending access to a human customer service as a primary solution. Is there time for EO to dicsuss this on an upcoming call? Ian. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > Dear EOWG, > > A participant of the WCAG working group provided comments on the final draft > of Developing Websites for Older People, which is at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sites-older-users/ > > The comments are online at: > http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/User:Cbeer/WCAG_20100909 > > A draft reply to the commenter is below. > > Please review the draft reply below and send any comments to the list in > preparation for discussion in EOWG this Friday. > > Thanks, > ~Shawn > > # DRAFT START # > > Dear Chris, > > Thank you for your comments on the draft Developing Websites for Older > People document. > Document: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sites-older-users/ > Comments: http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/User:Cbeer/WCAG_20100909 > Please find below responses from EOWG. > > # Overall comments: > > Many of the aspects you raise are beyond the scope of this document, which > is intended for developers who are looking for concrete guidance on how to > improve their websites rather than for background information. > > Some of these aspects are covered in the Literature Review [1], which > provides the foundation for this document. The Literature Review is > currently a working draft and we welcome your comments on it, too, if you > are interested. > > [1] Web Accessibility for Older Users: A Literature Review > - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wai-age-literature> > > We also expect readers of this document to have read Web Accessibility and > Older People: Meeting the Needs of Ageing Web Users [2] and obtained > additional background about older people using the Web before they read this > document. (Although of course we cannot be certain that they have other > background information, it is not the purpose of this document to provide > it.) > > [2] Web Accessibility and Older People: Meeting the Needs of Ageing Web > Users > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/ > > # Perceivable information and user interface - CAPTCHA > > As this technique is not applicable to all websites (in particular, to the > many websites of smaller organizations or of individuals) and not ideal for > many people (for instance, because of cost of making a call, limitations of > phone operator availability, etc). This does not make it apt to weight it > above other technical solutions that provide alternatives that are integral > parts of a website. > > # Operable user interface and navigation - Distractions (audience) > > The level of conformance that website owners select or must adhere to is a > policy question and out of scope for this particular document. > > # Robust content and reliable interpretation - Older equipment/software > > This document maps some of the needs of older people identified in the > Literature Review to existing WCAG 2.0 Techniques. Developing such > techniques is, however, out of scope of this particular effort. We encourage > the development of additional WCAG 2.0 Techniques that we can add to this > document. > > Thank you again for taking the time to read and comment on this document. > > Regards, > Andrew Arch, > Shadi About Zahra, > Shawn Henry, > for EOWG > > > ### > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 11:55:55 UTC