- From: Liam McGee <liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:08:23 +0000
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- CC: eowg <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
On 24/03/2010 18:28, Shawn Henry wrote: > If we were to cover in-person "training" how much would it expand the > document? Substantially, I think. >> Use an easy to read font face. >> Sans is not *always* easier to read than serif - too much of a >> generalisation. Suggest mentioning a few commonly available fonts by >> name instead. > > um - I wonder if that would be more complicated on our end. Maybe just > saying "Use an easy-to-read font face. Avoid fancy fonts that are > difficult to read." is enough given the scope of this document/page? Yes, much better. >> Caption or otherwise make available audio... >> Well, if CART is not available then a transcript after the event would >> be a good fallback. > > I meant the after-the-event stuff to be covered under "Providing > recording afterwards". Maybe that point should be expanded? Ah, OK >> Preparing Handouts >> Could mention font size, line length, line spacing, colours and >> contrast. Mention different ways of presenting data - graphical, >> tabulated, narrative description. > > Right. My first reaction is that would start down a slippery slope of > scope creep. What do others think? Heh, OK. Agreed. -- Liam McGee Communis Ltd t: +44 (0)1373 836 476 e: liam@communis.co.uk w: www.communis.co.uk twit: www.twitter.com/liammcgee
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:19:24 UTC