RE: CART acronym needed or link good?

I think the first occurrence of the term, must be expanded in the text and
add in parentheses the acronym linked to its definition in the glossary.

The next time it occurs, should show only the acronym (marked appropriately)
and linked to the glorasio.

Take this opportunity to apologize for being unable to attend today's
meeting.

Regards,

Emmanuelle

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Directora de la Fundación Sidar
Coordinadora del Seminario SIDAR
www.sidar.org
email: coordina@sidar.org / emmanuelle@sidar.org



-----Mensaje original-----
De: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] En nombre
de Yeliz Yesilada
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de abril de 2010 11:41
Para: eowg
Asunto: Re: CART acronym needed or link good?

I agree, this should be OK.

Regards,
Yeliz.
On 23 Apr 2010, at 11:27, Liam McGee wrote:

> On 22/04/2010 22:37, Shawn Henry wrote:
>> The acronym is "Computer Aided Real–Time Captioning or Communication
>> Access Realtime Translation". I'm not sure it is best to have that
>> marked up each time. I was thinking because each instance links to  
>> the
>> definition in the Terminology section where it is explained, then  
>> that
>> would be sufficient.
>>
>> EOWG, What do you think?
>
> If linked then no problem.
>
> -- 
> Liam McGee
> Communis Ltd
>
> t: +44 (0)1373 836 476
> e: liam@communis.co.uk
> w: www.communis.co.uk
> twit: www.twitter.com/liammcgee
>
> ***50 ways to make Google Love your Website***
> by Steve Johnston & Liam McGee
> Published by Random House
> Now available from Amazon - http://bit.ly/googlelovebook
>

Received on Friday, 23 April 2010 11:29:36 UTC