- From: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:56:42 -0700
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: catherine <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1e3451610908271756s72c6731dh87b5d52fdf6e85f3@mail.gmail.com>
Although I'm skeptical about how readers will take "disable people" (I visualize a machete coming out of the monitor and severing the users hands), the addition of "from using the Web" is weird on my ears. I don't believe I've ever seen "disable *from*" - "prevented from" I have seen/heard, but not the former. I don't know why but it just sounds weird. Love. On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > catherine wrote: > >> Finally, I reiterate that, for the content at the aforementionned URL, >> second paragraph, last sentence, it is preferable to convey that >> innaccessible ressources exclude people (and not "disable people"). I really >> do feel that it puts a negative spin on the state of disability that is >> unnecessary in this context. >> > > Hi Catherine, > > Several EOWG participants like the phrase as it is at the end of this > paragraph: > "The web is a flexible medium that enables most people with impairments to > use the web just as well as anyone. Think about what this means: There is > inherently no such thing as a disability using the web. ...However: When > websites and web tools are not accessible, they disable people from using > the web." > > With the addition of "from using the web" does this still bother you? Can > you say more about it to help us understand your perspective? > > (Note that that paragraph is likely to be rewritten -- but it still helps > us to know your perspective so the rewrite can take it into account.) > > Thanks, > ~Shawn > > -- http://www.boobam.org/webgeezermild.htm
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 00:57:24 UTC